- Details
- Written by: Glenn and Rick
- Category: Socio-Political National
- Hits: 9
I was the US soft power czar. Our reputation may never recover from this.Guardian. Richard Stengel 5 April 2026 Early one Sunday morning in the summer of 2003, I drove into the center of a little South African beach town on the Indian Ocean to pick up the Cape papers. Local news agents still employed the English custom of putting front pages on A-frame stands on the sidewalk. It was during the first months of the Iraq war, and from two blocks away, I could see the headline, in big block type: “WHY BUSH IS WORSE THAN BIN LADEN.” It was disheartening to see – especially so far from home – but it did correspond to something familiar: American favorability around the world tends to swing sharply with wars (especially ones America starts) and who the US president is. Within weeks of the American attack, the international support the US had after 9/11 was squandered.
In 2003, after the invasion of Iraq, American global favorability was at a modern low: in the 30-40% range. It had been above 50% for Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George HW Bush, and got into the 70% range for Bill Clinton. (Some wars are more popular than others: George HW Bush’s Gulf war to liberate Kuwait was globally popular.) After the decline of the Iraq war, American favorability shot upward again with the election of Barack Obama, whose favorability reached 75-80% in some countries. The foreign policy word for favorability is soft power: how our culture and popularity, rather than our military strength, allows us to influence other nations. The US government buttresses this with foreign aid (once abundant) and US international broadcasting, such as Voice of America. But culture always outperforms government programs, Beyoncé always beats bureaucracy. It is the power of influence, not the influence of power.American soft power often mirrors what we do with our hard power: our influence declines when we use the latter and increases when we don’t. Absent military action, Taylor Swift is more important than Tomahawk missiles. Most of the time, culture eats policy for breakfast, except in wartime – like now
Because of Donald Trump and his war in Iran, American popularity will descend to depths it has not seen this century.......I was the under secretary of state for public diplomacy in the Obama administration, which is the job of soft power czar. In some ways, I thought of myself as the chief marketing officer of “Brand USA”. The mission is to help shape and promote America’s image abroad. During the cold war, we used to send Louis Armstrong and Ella Fitzgerald to eastern Europe as cultural ambassadors, to show foreign publics that we were broad-minded and freedom-loving. During that same time period, we created Voice of America and Radio Free Europe to broadcast news in places where it was repressed or distorted. Of course, these efforts were not all innocent. Many were financed by the CIA. But I believe because of Donald Trump and his war in Iran, American popularity will descend to depths it has not seen this century and may never recover to the median levels that we saw with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Forget Barack Obama numbers – they’re out of reach.
Confidence in Trump’s ability to navigate global affairs was already around 30-40% before the invasion of Iran. That will be the new ceiling. “The world is watching,” Trump said in his White House address on Wednesday. American influence campaigns in Guatemala, Iran and Italy, among others, were also part of the darker side of soft power. But I believe because of Donald Trump and his war in Iran, American popularity will descend to depths it has not seen this century and may never recover to the median levels that we saw with Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Forget Barack Obama numbers – they’re out of reach. Confidence in Trump’s ability to navigate global affairs was already around 30-40% before the invasion of Iran. That will be the new ceiling. “The world is watching,” Trump said in his White House address on Wednesday. Yes, it is......read on https://www.theguardian.com/
- Details
- Written by: Glenn and Rick
- Category: Socio-Political National
- Hits: 14
How rampant violence made Nigeria an insecurity hotspot in the Sahel – mapped. Guardian Eromo Egbejule, Antonio Voce, Ashley Kirk, Alex Olorenshaw, and Stefania Orlando 19 may 2026 Data lays bare the extent and geographical spread of attacks in Africa’s most populous country Keep on scrolling through the article.....https://www.
- Details
- Written by: Glenn and Rick
- Category: Socio-Political National
- Hits: 30
- Details
- Written by: Glenn and Rick
- Category: Socio-Political National
- Hits: 52
VERY BAD NEWS.....The Guardian view on Donald Trump and the climate crisis: the US is in reverse while China ploughs ahead. Editorial 2-15-2026 The president’s destructive policies enrich fossil fuel billionaires, while Beijing has bet big on the green transition. The world is closer than thought to a “point of no return” after which runaway global heating cannot be stopped, scientists have said.
Continued global heating could trigger climate tipping points, leading to a cascade of further tipping points and feedback loops, they said. This would lock the world into a new and hellish “hothouse Earth” climate far worse than the 2-3C temperature rise the world is on track to reach. The climate would also be very different to the benign conditions of the past 11,000 years, during which the whole of human civilisation developed.At just 1.3C of global heating in recent years, extreme weather is already taking lives and destroying livelihoods across the globe. At 3-4C, “the economy and society will cease to function as we know it”, scientists said last week, but a hothouse Earth would be even more fiery. The public and politicians were largely unaware of the risk of passing the point of no return, the researchers said. The group said they were issuing their warning because while rapid and immediate cuts to fossil fuel burning were challenging, reversing course was likely to be impossible once on the path to a hothouse Earth, even if emissions were eventually slashed.
It was difficult to predict when climate tipping points would be triggered, making precaution vital, said Dr Christopher Wolf, a scientist at Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Associates in the US. Wolf is a member of a study team that includes Prof Johan Rockström at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria. Crossing even some of the thresholds could commit the planet to a hothouse trajectory,” said Wolf. “Policymakers and the public remain largely unaware of the risks posed by what would effectively be a point-of-no-return transition.
“It’s likely that global temperatures are [already] as warm as, or warmer than, at any point in the last 125,000 years and that climate change is advancing faster than many scientists predicted.”It is also likely that carbon dioxide levels are the highest they have been in at least 2m years......READ ON https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/feb/11/point-of-no-return-hothouse-earth-global-heating-climate-tipping-points
- Details
- Written by: Glenn and Rick
- Category: Socio-Political National
- Hits: 54
Trump has launched an unprecedented assault on the environment. Where’s the pushback? Guardian Rei Takver 4 Mar 2026 Climate deniers expected more resistance to the fossil fuel blitz. But Democrats, billionaires and activists have gone silent.This story is published in partnership with DeSmog, the climate investigations site As Donald Trump assaults the legal foundation of America’s ability to regulate global warming emissions, climate deniers have been privately celebrating what they claim is the “silent” acquiescence of billionaires, Democrats, climate activists and even reporters to the president’s aggressive pro-fossil-fuel agenda. “In my 26 years of being focused on climate, I’ve never seen anything like this. Trump is gutting everything they ever stood for,” Marc Morano, a longtime climate denier, said in January at the World Prosperity Forum, a five-day event in Zurich, Switzerland, billed as a rightwing alternative to the World Economic Forum in Davos.The event’s sponsor was the Heartland Institute, a conservative thinktank that has been at the forefront of spreading climate disinformation for decades, and was also a contributor to Project 2025, the policy blueprint for Trump’s second administration. “Billionaires are silent. Democrats in Congress have been silent. Climate activists. There has been no pushback on this,” Morano said – and he may have a point, according to some experts who research the climate denial movement.
“The Trump administration just marched in and destroyed the crown jewel of climate science in the United States,” Robert Brulle, a professor of environment and society at Brown University, told me, referring to the Trump administration’s dismantling
”Elimination of the endangerment finding had long been a core goal of the climate denial movement Last month, the Trump administration repealed the 2009 “endangerment finding” establishing that greenhouse gas pollution endangers public health. It was a determination that undergirded the federal government’s authority to limit climate-heating pollution from automobiles and power plants. Elimination of the endangerment finding had long been a core goal of the climate denial movement. Its repeal is just the latest in a long line of Trump’s climate-related destruction. Since taking office in January 2025, his administration has significantly curtailed the country’s weather forecasting organizations and climate science research facilities, published reports denying established climate science, and made deep cuts to funding for climate-related energy and community projects. Under the leadership of Trump’s appointee Chris Wright, the Department of Energy last year all but banned its key renewable energy department from using terminology like “climate change”, “green”, and “sustainability.”“Trump overturned Biden’s climate agenda at breakneck speed,” Morano said at the Heartland Institute’s Zurich forum.
Instead of pushing back on this blitz, many Democratic party representatives have retreated from talking
This trend hasn’t gone without resistance in the party, however. “Anyone who cares about what fossil fuel pollution is doing to Earth’s natural systems needs to ignore these so-called ‘climate hushers’ – people who think Dems should stop talking about climate,” Democratic senator Sheldon Whitehouse posted on social media in January. Genevieve Guenther, a climate communications expert and founding director of the advocacy group End Climate Silence, largely agrees. “The Democrats’ climate hushing is politically foolish,” she said in an email. “It only benefits the Trump regime’s agenda.”......read on https://www.theguardian.com/
More Articles …
- How the World’s Most Powerful Corporations Have Fought Accountability for Climate Change.
- Trump Says We Have the “Hottest” Economy. Markets Tell a Different Story.
- Democratic Doctors Are Pouring Into Politics. Thank Trump and RFK Jr
- Rising Power Prices are becoming a Political Liability for Republicans
Page 1 of 12